Reporting on incidents of self-harm responsibly

  • Share

StigmaWatch report received: November 2018

Issue: An article was published on a popular online news site, describing in graphic detail, a self-harm incident of an Australian teenager overseas. Images were also included which depicted the location, meaning that the risk of copycat self-harm attempts was heightened. The publication also shared the story on their social media pages with the self-harm method included in the headline.

Result: StigmaWatch contacted the news outlet and recommended that the details surrounding the self-harm incident should be removed from the article.  The recommendation was also made to not share the article on their social media channels.

Why it mattered? Publishing details of self-harm is highly problematic and detailed descriptions of methods should be minimised.  Explicit descriptions of self-harm have been linked to copycat behaviour and methods of self-harm are often similar or the same as methods of suicide.

Self-harm and suicide are distinct and separate acts although some people who self-harm are at an increased risk of suicide.  Therefore, the media must ensure that they adhere to the Mindframe Guidelines when writing about self-harm incidents, in the same way they do when covering stories about mental illness and suicide.

Last updated: 4 April 2019

Stay in touch

Never miss an important update from SANE.

Please let us know your first name.
Please let us know your last name.
Please let us know your email address.

Please select at least one newsletter